Support |
Krispen Hartung wrote: > "X is red" and "X is Good" are entirely different. One we can > verify, the other is empty. Unfortunately language is sometimes used in an unprecise way. Depending on the context "X is good" can imply an empty meaningles statement, or is just short for "I like X and think its good, look at it, you might come to the same conclusion". If Krispens says "X is good" (Which he would only do in a context where the other part can't missunderstand it) I would replace it with the long sentence. If a virtuoso guitar teacher says Al DiMeola is a better guitar player than me adding "Thats what I call a good guitarist", I'd understand it as a comparison of technical skills etc... And if you listen to the collection of "Thats what I call music", you know that statement is just meaningless bullshit, though its stated as a personal view of things --- its obviously not... Yes Krispen I totally agree to your view, I just added some examplesof how all the confusion can come up... I'd consider Wittgenstein a good reading on the topic as well... Stefan -- Stefan Tiedje------------x------- --_____-----------|-------------- --(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()------- -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- ----------()--------www.ccmix.com