Support |
Well, to further clarify.. for me it's not that corrupted pitch manipulation is bad, it's that I prefer it to be ONE texture in a piece, rather than for it to become the overriding texture imposed on every subsequent overdub... If the algorhythm were applied to the playback and left the input alone, I'd be happier. >And so The Quest continues for the Ultimate Looping Tool. > >My wife, bless her innocence in all of this, jus twrites it all off as >magic when I try to excplain that it's all about signal path >processing. > >Could it be that the ideal situation is to have a variety of looping >tools at hand to send the sound to be processes either as Charles's >UNCORRUPTED pitch shifts, Mark's deliciously CORRPUTED pitch shifts, >or BOTH? I say that, now that I have added the Repeater and still have >my Vortexes and DD-20s to use as looping devices ... > >...thinking I may need to find some better, quieter A/B/Y switches and >re-configure the studio ... AGAIN! > >I've barely had my Repeater long enough to start programming the FCB >to MIDI-control it; I've not tried the pitch-shifting or stretching >yet ... so I still have some things to look forward to (especially if >I can get that elusive OS 2.+ upgrade!). > >Keep looping, > >Dennis > > >On 2/15/08, Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >What exactly is the point of UNCORRUPTED pitch shifting?? Play a >> >different note I say... I absolutely LOVE the sound of the repeaters >> >time stretching, and PURPOSELY load up empty patches from CFC so >> >that It pitches my shit a bit wrong... >> >> >> >> I hear you, the artifacts are cool and can be a lot of fun - HOWEVER >> - these artifacts should be a function of the playback process. In >> the Repeater, newly recorded audio is inextricably corrupted when >> employing the time stretch function. It's a halfassed implementation. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ... >> http://www.zmix.net >> >> -- ... http://www.zmix.net