Re: OT: slow HD+Logic (was: upgrading my MacBook)

["Per Boysen" <perboysen@gmail.com>]

He must be talking about monitoring through the software. If I record
someone that wants "a bit reverb on the mic input" I do software
monitoring for an effect send loop with a software reverb plug-in. But
I never do it for the direct signal, because of the latency problem.
Regarding reverb it is not a monitoring problem since reverb has no
timing and thus doesn't sound bad when under latency.

Per


On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Simeon Harris
<simeonharris40@googlemail.com> wrote:
> yes, but if you have an audio interface that allows direct monitoring of 
>the
> input signal, it's not a problem (although i'm not exactly sure what you
> mean by "monitoring" as something separate from recording)
> sim
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Warren Sirota <wsirota@wsdesigns.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Simeon Harris
>> <simeonharris40@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> oh, and the buffer size for the audio interface makes a huge difference
>>> as well. larger numbers for better performance
>>>
>>
>> and greater latency, which is no problem for recording, but might be for
>> monitoring
>
>