Support |
Just my 2 cents on this,i am trying out the Digitech vocalist 4 at the moment,very nice and the telphone radio efx are there without the feedback drawback,very twaekable and it also sounds definetly nicer than the harmony G,you cannot beat the price for a harmonizer with IQ,vox fxs processor and simple acoustic guitar fx processor as well,and its still cheaper than buying the voice tone create and the harmony G together, my only wish is that it was smaller! www.myspace.com/luisangulocom --- On Fri, 11/21/08, Mech <mech@m3ch.net> wrote: > From: Mech <mech@m3ch.net> > Subject: Re: Voicetone Create (was: RC-50 vs. Laptop Setup: cost >comparison) > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > Date: Friday, November 21, 2008, 6:50 AM > At 12:27 AM +0100 11/21/08, Buzap Buzap wrote: > > > >> Oh, it'll do those "telephone type" > effects. There's a distortion > >> block that'll allow you to re-EQ for all > kinds of effects like that, > >> IIRC. > > > > did you really get any decent "telephone > effect"? > > Well, for the short time I was kicking it around, sounded > pretty good to me. But I was using it purely in a studio > context and not live. > > > I always ended up with so much feedback - I gave it > up. > > Ah, now that's a slightly different issue. I'm > pretty sure that it's sorta linked to the nature of the > effect. Back 20 years ago when I was mixing live sound for > a friend's band, the same thing almost drove me insane. > They had a song where they wanted the same effect (I was > using a standard graphic eq for this at the time). Every > time I kicked it in, it was a complete crapshoot whether I > would wind up with howling feedback or not. Seems most of > the mid-band frequencies you accentuate for the effect are > also in the sweet spot for the room resonance of most > venues. > > Finally figured that, for a live effect, the most stable > thing to do is to turn it into a telephone effect before it > ever gets to the microphone. Easiest way to do this is to > buy a cheap used megaphone (the crappier the better), turn > it down to a manageable level, and have the vocalist sing > through it about a foot off the microphone. > > Not only did that work for us, I actually saw the singer > for The Fall (amongst others) use that same technique a few > years later. > > > Good point you made: it's not only for vocals. > Whenever you need decent reverbs in you chain. > > Too bad it's only MonoIn>mono/stereoOut > > Thanks! Only upside of the Mono In thing is that *most* of > us would only be mic-ing a single amp -- at least for a > single effect. If you're running a stereo pair, odds > are that you want individual control over each amp, so > you'd have two Creates in your chain anyway. :) > > --m. > -- _____ > "take one step outside yourself. the whole path lasts > no longer than one step..."