Support |
On 29 Nov 2008, at 15:24, andy butler wrote: > > > Stephen Scott wrote: >>> with the following setting >>> AutoRecord=Off >>> LoopCopy = ti (time) >>> SwitchQuant = Off >>> >>> set tempo >>> >>> record loop 1, let it run >>> >>> then to record loop 2 hit Next, >>> and when you have enough cycles hit Rec. >>> Then toggle between the loops with Next. >> OK Andy, I tried this exactly as suggested. I've set the tempo to >> 120bpm, (btw 8th/Cycles=8, so that the display reads 2.0 for the >> cycle length). What happens is that the first loop records just >> fine for as long as I need. When I switch to Next Loop, the >> display shows me that it's on loop2 (OK), the red LED counts time >> as usual (OK) and the green cycle LED counts up as I think it >> should (ie, it increments by one every 2 seconds). BUT when I >> press RECORD, the display stops at, say, 3.6 or 5.4, ie NOT a >> multiple of 2 as expected. >> This is now happening consistently (previously I thought I was >> getting it work OK sometimes, so consistency is good anyway). >> Also, previously, even when it was working OK, I'd save the preset >> parameter, but when I came back it to it later, it wouldn't work. >> > > sorry, you're quite right, > end the second recording with Insert and all will work fine. > > Otherwise that's an Unrounded ending to the record. > > > Here exposed the perils of an early morning email session :-) > > > I'll CC this to Matthias, it's an interesting point. > This is rather confusing behaviour for a feature that's supposed to > make things easy, hitting Insert is hardly intuitive. You are right, Andy! especially since some users might not even install the Insert button Sorry Stephan! I read through these mails and did not see the problem myself... unfortunately I cannot fix this for the EDP, but I try for its emulation ;-) If we make ending with Record rounded, we will loose an option though: Now you can set to TimeCopy and if you spontaneously want to add a loop with a different timing, just end that one with Record, isn't that interesting?