Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: ART Regular Output vs. Inspiration



yeah but what i am saying is they concentrated more on the music,then 
others would come and want to be part of them and help them,i dont know 
that all of that were their own ideas...Pink Floyd had a lof external 
input from Gilmour pedalboards to their quadraphonic system and stage 
lightshows,no doubt is a blessing nowdays being able to be in control of 
every little detail of your career but theres was a sense of more 
community and colaboration back in those days than now.

www.myspace.com/luisangulocom


--- On Fri, 12/5/08, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: ART Regular Output  vs. Inspiration
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:39 AM
> > You know, i am not a hippie and wasnt born in that time
> but  when i see all those classic rock bands it seems the
> last thing they f*ckin cared about is the sound system,and
> although they had limited gear they did so much with it.
> 
> Um...
> Grateful Dead, famous for their innovative "wall of
> sound" sound system.
> Pink Floyd, innovators of the quadrophonic pa.
> Led Zep, well known for the loudest pa.
> 
> Bands cared about the live sound in those days.
> 
> What is not ever mentioned is that live sound in the mid
> 70's
> was generally much better than it is today,
> nowadays gigs aren't about that at all.
> 
> 
> andy butler