Silly me. I just checked Razor Lame and it offers high bit rates in an options menu.
Paul
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Paul Richards <paulrichard_rocks@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Paul Richards <paulrichard_rocks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: OT That 'sizzle sound' of Mp3s
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 12:46 PM
|
So, what software do folks use to rip CD's at the high kbps rate that was mentioned a few e-mails back?
Paul
--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Miko Biffle <biffoz@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Miko Biffle <biffoz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OT That 'sizzle sound' of Mp3s
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 3:28 PM
For the most part, vinyl mastering and production esthetics were more mid-rangey and compared to modern production a little "honkey" sounding. Compression and volume maximization aside, I prefer the broader tonal spectrum of modern recordings. I love Hendrix, but most of recordings still have that narrower range and less bass, giving the recordings a dated sound. MP3's of the same recordings sound dated as well. I understand the basics of high end interpolation and sampling, but still, I just don't hear it.
So I have no problem with MP3's and regularly listen to orchestral as well as dense, heavy material on two very different and high quality systems. Utility is awesome and I just don't hear the difference between "CD Quality MP3" and .wav files. I haven't had enough experience with AIFF to compare to WAVE and MP3. Call me insensitive. -m
--
Miko Biffle
Biffoz@Gmail.com
"Running scared
from all the usual distractions!"
|
|
