RE: Looperlative questions

["William Walker" <billwalker@baymoon.com>]

Eight independent loops that can be synced or not synced, with independence
over track length, track speed, panning, and direction. There are multiply
functions, and both cue and play once functions.  I rarely use the multiply
function as it's just as easy to create a longer loop length than the
original simply by recording a longer loop on a new track.  This is, and I
repeat, a different beast than an EDP, and though they share some
similarities, you would be wise to throw out any preconceived ideas that it
will act like an EDP.
 Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hamburg [mailto:mark@grubmah.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:37 AM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Looperlative questions

I'm contemplating moving from the EDP to the Looperlative. Yeah, it  
would be nice to keep both, but part of the point of this is to reduce  
rack space consumption. But this leads to some questions:

* Am I correct in my impression that the core model for the  
Looperlative is essentially 8 parallel Line6 DL-4s -- i.e., the  
primary controls are record/overdub and play. Is there even a play  
once function?

* Is there support for multiply? I've seen a chart that says yes. I've  
seen threads that say no. Is this expected to be handled by recording  
a separate loop for the extended portion?

* I've seen talk of a cue function for providing command  
synchronization at various boundaries. Did this ever get implemented?

Thanks.
Mark