Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Seriously though, one of the ways to push my buttons is to make blanket "this is better" statements rather than "I like this better for these reasons." Film has a look and has some advantages, but it poisons the environment and for what... grandma's snapshots of her grandkids? Best put that stuff digitally. Also, my best friend works for Leaf camera and they'll put most film under the table quality wise, though they're super expensive. It's all moot though, as both tape and film will be gone soon. Because they're so much better? Maybe not in every way or to everyone. On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Mark Sottilaro<zerocrossing@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, it's just that this type of goodolddayism is keeping the flying >car > and silver jump suits from becoming reality! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Miko Biffle <biffoz@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We're watching you Francombe! U sum kinda FORMAT JUNKIE?! *-) -m >> >> On 7/28/09, mark francombe <mark@markfrancombe.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yo.. mate... cheer up a bit... >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Mark Sottilaro ><zerocrossing@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:05 AM, mark >>> >>> francombe<mark@markfrancombe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Sorry, but Film IS better than digital, and Tape IS better than >>> >>> digital... >>>>> >>>>> but I agree.. close enough and a hell of a lot more convenient... >>>>> no I was just thinking about the way people hear... >>>> >>>> These statements are false. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.markfrancombe.com >>> http://vimeo.com/user825094 >>> http://uk.youtube.com/user/markfrancombe >>> http://www.myspace.com/markfrancombe >>> http://www.looop.no/shop/catlabel.php?q=Synch%20Non%20Synch >>> >> >> >> -- >> Miko Biffle >> Biffoz@Gmail.com >> MBiffle@FoxRacingShox.com >> "Running scared from all the usual distractions!" >> >