Re: automation or triggering functions

["L.Angulo" <labaloops@yahoo.com>]

I use all traditional which makes it feel like an open cavas and might 
bring surprises everytime,though the main drawback i see with this is the 
proccess of arriving to the something and the time it takes plus the tap 
dancing while playing simultaneously the idea you are spontaneously 
getting across,might not be so exciting for the listener,while the other 
approach might free you more and make improvisations more relax and 
focused...

www.myspace.com/luisangulocom


--- andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> schrieb am Fr, 31.7.2009:

> Von: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>
> Betreff: Re: automation or triggering functions
> An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Datum: Freitag, 31. Juli 2009, 23:08
> All "traditional" here.
> 
> Playing the technology as an instrument.
> 
> I think this all live approach has a better feel, more
> expressive.
> So I don't mind the effort to learn to do it.
> The downside is having to know what to do when it all goes
> wrong ;-)
> 
> I might use some mini-sequences in the future, kind of
> "special effects",
> I'd be running them on the Gordius Midi controller and
> they'd
> be midi synced to the edp.
> 
> andy butler
> 
> Raul Bonell wrote:
> > i'd like to know some pros/cons, likes/dislikes about
> this two
> > different approaches to looping:
> > 
> > 1) automatic control of your looper of choice by a
> hw/sw sequencer.
> > 
> > vs.
> > 
> > 2) "traditional" trigger/modulation of
> functions/parameters by means
> > of a physical controller.
> > 
> > anybody using a mix of both?
> > 
> > i'd be curios to know.
> > 
> 
>