Support |
...I use the reverse on the RC-300. Did you need to control certain parameters of the reverse feature?--On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, daniel <daniel@ithinkwethink.org> wrote:
I haven't had a chance to mess with the 300 yet, but from everything I've read about, I have little interest. It seems too cluttered with effects I don't need and lacks the one I do -- reverse.
My 50 has been lacking in sound when I turn it on for the first time since it's last been off and needs to be turned off and on for it to work. I just reformatted it and it still had that issue...I'm going to spend some more time trying to figure out that issue. Plus, it's beginning to get noisy on it's own (eg. I'll turn the instrument volume down all the way and there'll be needless noise that disappears when I turn the 50 master volume down or take it out of my chain. Sad to see this happen, I fucking looove this thing and am dependent on it my band, 3dCosby.On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Brent Taylor <threeleggedyoyo@hotmail.com> wrote:
Well the RC300 is a pretty logical step forward. It's what I use and I came straight from an RC50 as well.It's a big step forward in most ways although a slight step backward in a couple.Might I ask what's fading with the 50? Haven't used mine since I upgraded but mine is still going strong. Wondering what one might expect.~Brenthttps://www.facebook.com/ScienceGoneWrong
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:52:45 -0400
Subject: might be that time
From: daniel@ithinkwethink.org
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.comAfter nearly 6 years, my rc50 is beginning to show signs of fading.
I've messed with the EH 45000 and dug it, but not sure it's on the same level as the rc50...With the Boss pedal, I love having the three separate phrases and it's fairly toe-twiddling compatable which is crucial for me.Any recommendations on a good replacement for when the inevitable happens?
Jean-Paul De Roover
www.jeanpaulderoover.com
(807) 251-3376