Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I've been thinking "Cut And Splice" would be quite descriptive for this processing. ... Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.perboysen.com http://www.youtube.com/perboysen On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Philip Clevenger <phil.clevenger@gmail.com> wrote: > Lindsey, > > Think of it more like an xacto knife and some splicing tape. The feature > would take the knife and make two cuts, remove some small section of > content; then the algorithm (the splicing tape) would join the two > remaining > ends from which the piece was removed. > > So the thing that prevents the removed pieces from getting play time > would > be the fact that they are simply no longer there to be played :) > > Now… what does this do to loop windowing? ;) > > P > > On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Lindsey Walker <lindsey.walker@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm still thinking square waves but now with a low pass filter. Isn't > that > the whatchacallit that would prevent the removed pieces from getting play > time? > > Lindsey > > On Nov 1, 2013 11:43 AM, "Matthias Grob" <matilists@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hahaha, unfortunately its not quite correct, since its not similar to >> undo, no backward but forward movement >> >> so you did not like Disect? that would be rather precise, no? >> Cutaway? Cutout? >> >> OWN a word? I'd rather own "brother-sync" but that would be screamingly >> absurd :-) >> >> On 1.Nov2013, at 3:19 PM, Philip Clevenger <phil.clevenger@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Unsert! Unsert! Own that new word, let's see it in the 2014 Oxford >> > Dictionary... >> > >> > I unsist... >> > >> > Phil :) >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >> On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 1.Nov2013, at 2:27 PM, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> On 10/29/2013 4:59 PM, Phil Clevenger wrote: >> >>>>>> But let's say I want to remove the tiniest bits of time from a >> >>>>>> loop, at any point I so desire, for the length of a switchpress >> >>>>>> ("Remove >> >>>>>> SUS"?)... >> >>> >> >>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> yes! >> >>>> even I would be using this :-) >> >>>> Unsert? Desert? or just Cut ? >> >>> >> >>> Uncertain, Cut off in the Desert... having no idea what to call this >> >>> function. Hm... what about "annihilate"? Thats what it does - >> >>> annihilates a slice inside the loop and remakes the loop as if that >> >>> slice has never existed. >> >> >> >> disagree, nihil=nothing and we only cut a bit. >> >> Desect? Cutout? >> >>> >> >>>> and where would it go in the user interface? another Insert option? >> >>> >> >>> I'd prefer a direct MIDI call, to not block any other function you >> >>> might want the insert button for (in case your question was put in >> >>> EDP-ish). Wouldn't people want to have Insert and Annihilate laid >> >>> out >> >>> on two different pedal switches in order to really go creative with >> >>> it? >> >> >> >> sure, direct MIDI inevitably, as all the other Insert button >> >> functions >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> we could start a statistic in Livelooping.org where users click >> >>>> what >> >>>> tool they use and what functions in it >> >>> >> >>> Excellent idea! I have not checked but there must be useful Poll >> >>> plugins for this in wordpress. >> >>> >> >>> ... >> >>> Greetings from Sweden >> >>> >> >>> Per Boysen >> >>> www.perboysen.com >> >>> http://www.youtube.com/perboysen >> >> >> > >> >