Re: wikipedia page on livelooping

[andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk>]

Mark F says

> > I for one would NOT be up for the job.

me neither, don't think I'm indepedant enough.

> > However the more general "Loop" aricle that Tyler cited
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) is quite ok. Despite SOME 
> > additions, and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping page 
> > should just be deleted and redirected to tis one.
> >
> > Mark

Well, if we have a *reference* to support the idea that live-looping
is some kind of art form in it's own right then surely
it can have it's own page.

But what exactly qualifies as a reference?


I learned a bit from that article.
Standard way to spam wikipedia for self promotion is to write
bits of biog then do a bogus reference which is actually one of your 
youtube vids.
Then it it *looks* like you're playing fair with wikipedia.



andy




> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <zzz@zzz.ch <mailto:zzz@zzz.ch>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello all!
> >     Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on 
> > livelooping. I tried to undo his changes but with no success, says there 
> > needs to be more 'references'... It might be a good time for those of us 
> > who'd be eager to share their stories to rebuild it? It totally is lame 
> > right now..
> >     http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping
> >     Cheers
> >     :)
> >     z
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > /_Mark Francombe_/
> > www.markfrancombe.com <http://www.markfrancombe.com/>
> > www.ordoabkhao.com <http://www.ordoabkhao.com/>
> > http://vimeo.com/user825094
> > http://www.looop.no <http://www.looop.no/>
> > twitter @markfrancombe