Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: wikipedia page on livelooping

Mark F says

I for one would NOT be up for the job.

me neither, don't think I'm indepedant enough.

However the more general "Loop" aricle that Tyler cited
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) is quite ok. Despite SOME 
additions, and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping page 
should just be deleted and redirected to tis one.


Well, if we have a *reference* to support the idea that live-looping
is some kind of art form in it's own right then surely
it can have it's own page.

But what exactly qualifies as a reference?

I learned a bit from that article.
Standard way to spam wikipedia for self promotion is to write
bits of biog then do a bogus reference which is actually one of your 
youtube vids.
Then it it *looks* like you're playing fair with wikipedia.


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <zzz@zzz.ch <mailto:zzz@zzz.ch>> wrote:

    Hello all!
    Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on 
livelooping. I tried to undo his changes but with no success, says there 
needs to be more 'references'... It might be a good time for those of us 
who'd be eager to share their stories to rebuild it? It totally is lame 
right now..

/_Mark Francombe_/
www.markfrancombe.com <http://www.markfrancombe.com/>
www.ordoabkhao.com <http://www.ordoabkhao.com/>
http://www.looop.no <http://www.looop.no/>
twitter @markfrancombe