Mark F says
I for one would NOT be up for the job.
me neither, don't think I'm indepedant enough.
However the more general "Loop" aricle that Tyler cited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) is quite ok. Despite SOME additions, and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping page should just be deleted and redirected to tis one. Mark
Well, if we have a *reference* to support the idea that live-looping is some kind of art form in it's own right then surely it can have it's own page. But what exactly qualifies as a reference? I learned a bit from that article. Standard way to spam wikipedia for self promotion is to write bits of biog then do a bogus reference which is actually one of your youtube vids. Then it it *looks* like you're playing fair with wikipedia. andy
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote: Hello all! Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on livelooping. I tried to undo his changes but with no success, says there needs to be more 'references'... It might be a good time for those of us who'd be eager to share their stories to rebuild it? It totally is lame right now.. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping Cheers :) z -- /_Mark Francombe_/ www.markfrancombe.com <http://www.markfrancombe.com/> www.ordoabkhao.com <http://www.ordoabkhao.com/> http://vimeo.com/user825094 http://www.looop.no <http://www.looop.no/> twitter @markfrancombe