Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Another archival piece but not as old

That strikes me as a really really bad clarification. I must be tireder than I thought.

Yes, that is correct, there is no feedback mechanism to mix the played sound back in a Terry Riley Time Lag Accumulator sense

If we allow within the genre of looping delayed but not fed-back sounds - like Henry Kaiser does in that demo I posted a link to yesterday - then May is doing that style of looping, wherein the stacking is done acoustically 

Sorry about the murkification

From: takas20@hotmail.com
To: loopers-delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: RE: Another archival piece but not as old
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:42:08 +0000

Yes, that is correct. The looping is functional rather than additive (this is what Kaiser does - not using feedback but rather the representation of the original as acoustic phenomena, so there is acoustic addition without feedback).

> > short piece of close-looping
> ??? - I just hear 2 distinct delays exactly like the demo with distortion.
> andy