Support |
Hi to all Maybe we can elaborate.. Andy's assumptions are based on the fact the Axon processing of the signal has already peaked near the physical barrier (or so to say, adds no time lag to the response). This is probably a bit far fetched, and there is probably a lot of room for algorithm improvement, not even to mention alternative means. I have owned and still use a Roland GR50, a Yamaha G50 ( a rebadged Axon NGC 77) and an Axon AX100Mk2. Provided I use the internal sounds, the old GR50 yields better results than the latters on tapping, hammer-on and pull-off techniques. My guess was always that it used internally pitch to voltage tech while using pitch to midi for the midi out hence explaining why the built in sound did not match the midi out at the same time (I checked). If the Axon AX100MkII provides pick position recognition, it doesn't track any better nor quicker than its rebadged grand father Yamaha G50. The G50 even provides functions not available on the latter like octave transposing switches using S1/s2 switches. There is probably room for improvement. We now find software that can extract poly note information from a guitar output without any divided pick up. It even runs on an iPad. Gareth here proposed at a time some very interesting software projects. The question is more : this old race of guitar to midi or to synth can sustain innovation with this niche market. Regards Olivier