Message not deliverable

[<Administrator@CreatSvc-Ada.CCMAIL.compuserve.com>]

Sender: lists@slip.net
Received: from ferret.slip.net (ferret.slip.net [207.171.193.6]) by 
arl-img-3.com
puserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
        id MAA22768; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 12:52:03 -0400
Received: from lists by ferret.slip.net with local (Exim 1.61 #2)
        id 0wZflN-0001sQ-00; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:51:50 -0700
Message-Id: <8258.199706051208@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:08:36 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
From: pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk (Dr M. P. Hughes)
Subject: RE: Bob's steroidal JamMan implant
Resent-Message-ID: <"fl88HC.A.1mB.c4ulz"@ferret>
Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> archive/latest/162
X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: SmartList <lists@slip.net>
Resent-To: Russell_Gorton@creatsvc-ada.ccmail.compuserve.com
Resent-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:51:50 -0700

Bob:

>The A-D converter (input) on JamMan is mono while the D-A (output)   
>converter is stereo so all loops are recorded in mono.

This surprises me - why were stereo DACs included when only one is used? 
Was this upgrade planned, or is it because the JamMan shares gubbins with
mono-in /stereo out processors?  

>> You also said the Vortex
>> design team weren't planning a MIDI upgrade for this most essential   
>> piece of kit.  Can they be persuaded...?
>
>It's pretty unlikely but I'll keep you posted.

I think there's probably some demand 'round these parts.....

Michael

Dr Michael Pycraft Hughes      Bioelectronic Research Centre, Rankine Bldg,
Tel: (+44) 141 330 5979        University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
    "Wha's like us?  Damn few, and they're a' deid!" - Scottish proverb