Re: Repeater Update

[Michael Clark <mcl451@airmail.net>]

I'm so very happy I don't want one.

M..



At 02:11 PM 3/19/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Mark Sottilaro (01:20 PM 03/19/01) wrote:
>
> >I've lost my last bit of optimism.  The Repeater, at it's projected 
>price,
> >seemed too good to be true.  In November you just had to tweak your
> >powersupply
> >design and then the Repeater would ship.  8 months off?  It's time to
get an
> >Echoplex.  Sorry Electrix.  This is obviously vaporware.  What was that
> >thing in
> >the quicktime video of the namm demo?  It seemed to be a working 
>Repeater,
> >so what's the problem?  Fess up: you are unable to offer that product 
>for
> >$599 list.  It would have been nice if Electrix had been honest from the
> >start.
>
>The machine that was at Winter NAMM 2001 was NOT complete and a couple of 
>functions were not at production quality. Damon had stated that earlier.
>
>Sh*t happens.
>
>
>The Waldorf Q was release a year past it's announce date, the Alesis 
>Andromeda was back and forth for 3 years, Bob Moog's new machine will be 
>18 
>months past the hopeful date.
>
>
>Kudo's to Electrix for keeping folks in the loop.
>
>Mark
>
>