Re: dt harmony-central repeater review

[Mark Sottilaro <sine@zerocrossing.net>]

Woops, sorry Kim.  I was kind of waiting until I had a nice chunk of 
"quality
time" with the Repeater.  It came out at a time when work is kicking my 
ass, but
things are calming down now.  I'll go and write a review.

Mark

Kim Flint wrote:

> At 04:38 PM 9/19/2001, you wrote:
> >yeah, it is but isnt this a conflict of interest goin on here...(just 
>askin)?
> >stanner
>
> yeah, I ask people from the list to send in reviews to put on the LD 
>site,
> and instead you all are sending them to harmony-central! Traitors! :-)
>
> kim
>
> ps, I do need more repeater reviews...I've got a few that I will be 
>putting
> up shortly, but I know some of you are quite familiar with the unit now 
>and
> can give a very useful review that will be helpful to others. thanks....
>
> on 9/19/01 2:01 PM, hutton at hutton@pathcom.com wrote:
> >Thanks for the imfo.  ........ Very insightful!
> >
> >"Liebig, Steuart A." wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >howdy,
> >
> >for what it's worth . . .
> >
> >mr torn has reviewed the repeater on harmony-central. i don't remember 
>him
> >really giving much of his take on it on this list.
> >
> >in any event, i think it gives a slightly different slant on the box.
> >
> >here's the link, it's (as of right now) the first review on the page.
> >
> >http://harmony-central.com/Effects/Data/Electrix/Repeater-01.html
> >
> >stig
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Kim Flint                     | Looper's Delight
> kflint@loopers-delight.com    | http://www.loopers-delight.com