Re: stereo delay

[jim palmer <jimp@pobox.com>]

are you implying gibson has no current sales of anything?
electrix most certainly had no current sales of the repeater 
while they were developing it...

the edp is a "repeater-beater" already in some categories.
i just think that updated hardware is called for.
i imagine this will never happen, since you have just spent a lot 
getting CE-approval of the current hardware

the software is great, btw.
can't wait to try the new stuff...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Ewen" <andy.ewen@trace-elliot.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: stereo delay


> All manufacturers have this requirement if they want to stay in business
> past one product.
> Maybe you or someone who knows could give me a rough estimate on how much
> they think it would cost to develop a Repeater-Beater?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jim palmer [mailto:jimp@pobox.com]
> Sent: 10 October 2001 15:58
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: stereo delay
> 
> 
> good thing electrix didn't have this requirement...
> 
> 
> > At 07:26 PM 10/9/2001, Eric Williamson wrote:
> > >sharp contrast to the flint/grob/electrix way of things, innit?  i 
>might
> be
> > >buying a repeater as soon as i get the money from this Hammond organ
> sale, but
> > >it would be a 'plex if gibson would ever give kim and matthias some 
>real
> > >hardware and r&d budget for their product.
> > 
> > R&D budgets in the future require sales in the present.....
> > 
> > thanks for your support,
> > kim
> > 
>  
>