] [Thread Prev
Re: stereo delay
so far as I know, Electrix almost went out of business trying to develop
the repeater. It obviously cost them far more than they thought it would.
And you could argue they still shipped it prematurely, so the real price
even higher. If they want to do Repeater 2 and pay those costs all over
again, their only option is selling a lot of Repeaters.
At 08:32 AM 10/10/2001, jim palmer wrote:
>are you implying gibson has no current sales of anything?
>electrix most certainly had no current sales of the repeater
>while they were developing it...
>the edp is a "repeater-beater" already in some categories.
>i just think that updated hardware is called for.
>i imagine this will never happen, since you have just spent a lot
>getting CE-approval of the current hardware
>the software is great, btw.
>can't wait to try the new stuff...
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Andy Ewen" <email@example.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:11 AM
>Subject: RE: stereo delay
> > All manufacturers have this requirement if they want to stay in
> > past one product.
> > Maybe you or someone who knows could give me a rough estimate on how
> > they think it would cost to develop a Repeater-Beater?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jim palmer [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Sent: 10 October 2001 15:58
> > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> > Subject: Re: stereo delay
> > good thing electrix didn't have this requirement...
> > > At 07:26 PM 10/9/2001, Eric Williamson wrote:
> > > >sharp contrast to the flint/grob/electrix way of things, innit? i
> > be
> > > >buying a repeater as soon as i get the money from this Hammond organ
> > sale, but
> > > >it would be a 'plex if gibson would ever give kim and matthias some
> > > >hardware and r&d budget for their product.
> > >
> > > R&D budgets in the future require sales in the present.....
> > >
> > > thanks for your support,
> > > kim
> > >
Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
email@example.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com