[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
RE: new Behringer MIDI controller
Yeah, you are probably right. I just wish these manufacturers would
realize that it is much easier to figure out what patch to use with an
alphanumeric display vs. a numeric one. I know it affects memory
storage requirements and screen real estate, but it would be nice to
have something like this with a better read out.
Steve
>
> but I purchased the MFC10, and I've got to say it's damn
> expensive for
> something with one CC pedal and a plastic chassis. My guess is the
> Behringer will be half the price, I just couldn't wait for it to come
> out.
>
> Mark.
>
> On Monday, October 15, 2001, at 05:59 AM, M. Steven Ginn wrote:
>
> > To me, it doesn't appear to have any more features than the Yamaha
> > MFC10.
> >
> > Steve Ginn
> >
> >> I've downloaded the manual, and having a read through it
> now, since
> >> I'm also in the market for such a device.
> >>
> >> The English manual looks like a translation from German, so the
> >> German version may be clearer. The way it looks to me:
> >> - you can send up to 5 program changes in 1 FCB patch, so
> they would
> >> have to be on different channels, or else there's no point!
> >> - I think you set the MIDI channels up under Global
> settings (e.g.
> >> Prg Change 1 -> Channel 1 (Echoplex), Prg Change 1 -> Channel 2
> >> (PCM90), etc.)
> >> - Then, under each Preset, you specify what Prg Change to
> send out
> >> on the specified channels.
> >>
> >> Interesting...
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Brian Thomson
> >> bnt@email.com
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes
> >> free! http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?143
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>