RE: new Behringer MIDI controller

[Matthias Grob <matthias@grob.org>]

>Yeah, you are probably right.  I just wish these manufacturers would
>realize that it is much easier to figure out what patch to use with an
>alphanumeric display vs. a numeric one.  I know it affects memory
>storage requirements and screen real estate, but it would be nice to
>have something like this with a better read out.

see? you dont want the cheapest! ;-)

>
>Steve
>
>>
>>  but I purchased the MFC10, and I've got to say it's damn
>>  expensive for
>>  something with one CC pedal and a plastic chassis.  My guess is the
>>  Behringer will be half the price, I just couldn't wait for it to come
>>  out.
>>
>>  Mark.
>>
>>  On Monday, October 15, 2001, at 05:59 AM, M. Steven Ginn wrote:
>>
>>  > To me, it doesn't appear to have any more features than the Yamaha
>>  > MFC10.
>>  >
>>  > Steve Ginn
>>  >
>>  >> I've downloaded the manual, and having a read through it
>>  now, since
>>  >> I'm also in the market for such a device.
>>  >>
>>  >> The English manual looks like a translation from German, so the
>>  >> German version may be clearer. The way it looks to me:
>>  >>  - you can send up to 5 program changes in 1 FCB patch, so
>>  they would
>>  >> have to be on different channels, or else there's no point!
>>  >>  - I think you set the MIDI channels up under Global
>>  settings (e.g.
>>  >> Prg Change 1 -> Channel 1 (Echoplex), Prg Change 1 -> Channel 2
>>  >> (PCM90), etc.)
>>  >>  - Then, under each Preset, you specify what Prg Change to
>>  send out
>>  >> on the specified channels.
>>  >>
>>  >> Interesting...
>>  >>
>>  >> Cheers,
>>  >>
>>  >> Brian Thomson
>>  >> bnt@email.com
>>  >>
>>  >> --
>>  >>
>>  >> _______________________________________________
>>  >> Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes
>>  >> free! http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?143
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>
>>


-- 


          ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org