Re: EDP or REPEATER? Prices

[Mark Hamburg <mark_hamburg@baymoon.com>]

on 1/26/02 12:18 AM, Kim Flint at kflint@loopers-delight.com wrote:

> hmm?
> if "length of feature list" is important, the EDP in fact has far more
> features and loop functions than the Repeater. Our incomplete manual is
> more than twice as long as their incomplete manual. :-)

Here are the "features" I was thinking about on the Repeater:

* Stereo

* Effects loop (which can be switched in position thereby reducing the need
for a mixer, Switchblade, etc.)

* Higher sample rate (which ought to translate into somewhat better audio
specs)

* Pitch/Tempo shifting. That doesn't matter as much to me but I've seen
various uses of the Repeater based around playing extensively with pitch
shifting.

* A nice, solid feel to the knobs and switches (though I guess that gets
balanced against having an external power supply -- a point that surprises
me since the Mo-FX has an internal power supply)

In constrast, the better live looping features of the EDP are harder to
explain except to people who have been working reasonably extensively with
looping.

Mark