Re: request

[storm <storm.music@verizon.net>]

on 5/25/2002 3:21 PM, just john at just-john@just-john.com wrote:

>> on 5/24/2002 8:58 PM, just john at just-john@just-john.com wrote:
>> 
>>>> I am looking for schematics for the delta labs effectron I & II adm 
>1024
>>>> one works and the other doesn't so I need to get it fixed
>>>> 
>>>> any help will be appreciated
>>>> 
>>>> thanx!
>>> 
>>> Crikey!  I have an Effectron II, and the documentation may have just 
>what
>>> you need!  And I may have the documentation, somewhere!
>>> 
>>> Estimated time needed to locate it:  Several days.
>>> 
>>> But I'll give it a shot.
>>> ---
>>> * just-john@just-john.com  http://just-john.com/cn/rfe.shtml *
>>> 
>> I thought it was CriMey!
> 
> 
> That's the river, as in:  Crimey, a river ...
> 
> 
> 
>> the one that is broken is the effectron I but anything will help
>> send it whenever you can
> 
> I'm completely flabbergasted that I found the Effectron II documentation!
> It was in the same storage bin as the documentation for my Casio KX-101 
>and
> other bits ot 80s memorabilia.
> 
> Anyway, what I have is the "Owner's Manual  ADM 256/ADM 1024."  It 
>doesn't
> have any genuine schematics in it.   The closest it comes is what they 
>call
> a Block Diagram, which looks like somebody used an electronics template 
>--
> y'know, squiggly lines with a branch line to indicate a potentiometer's
> function, boxes for LFOs and VCOs -- to describe the signal flow.
> 
> The difference between this graphic and what I'd call a schematic is that
> it doesn't have part numbers or specifications.  For instance, the
> potentiometer functions it mentions don't mention ohms.  No voltages are
> mentioned anywhere.
> 
> It's a weird document, and I'm guessing it's not what you need, 'cuz
> anybody used to using the box already knows the processing flow.
> 
> Here's the sort of document I suspect you want:
> http://www.loopers-delight.com/tools/deltalabs/echotron.jpg (for a
> different device)   What I have is so high-level that the digital/audio
> conversion is represented as a small box with "D/A" in it.
> 
> So, d'ya think it's worth my time to (finally) unpack my scanner and set 
>it
> up and scan it?
> 
> ---
> * just-john@just-john.com  http://just-john.com/cn/rfe.shtml *
> 
it's cool....cuz I think my tech would need the specs anyway to get parts
....but if you find anything let me know!!

thanx!