Re: EH 16 second delay

[Mark Sottilaro <sine@zerocrossing.net>]

My bad.  It's just been so long since I've seen one of those devices, 
I've forgotten it's quirks.

Mark Sottilaro

On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 06:14  AM, Hedewa7@aol.com wrote:

> stan said,
>
>> heh heh heh-nice try mark...*nothing* i repeat(er)*nothing* remotely 
>> relates
>> to the <EH16secdelay>soundwise-operation wise,whatever wise. it is a 
>> one
>> of
>> a kind animal.
>
> disagree, here:
> the lexicon pcm42 (not-to-mention ---though i will--- a few digitech
> derivations thereof, & that orban thingy.....).
> the 42 is a bit more 'hifi', w/a more standardised interface, but.
> 'twas the model for the eh-16sd, right?
>
> though, i agree that certainly the devices mentioned by ms had very 
> little
> relation to the style/perspective/functionality of the eh-16sd.....
> best,
> dt / s-c
>