Re: long analog delay

["mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>]

can you add another bucket brigade to a memory man? is there a tech who 
will do this?


On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 04:45 PM, James Winger wrote:

> DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms.  It used a single 3005.
>
> Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly 
> regulated supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump out 
> delays of well over a second
> Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was very 
> distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply low-frequency 
> from the slow clock)
>
> you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together 
> (you'll get some loss from twice the buckets)
>
> lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the 
> frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy")
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net>
> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: long analog delay
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543)
> Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by 
> mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 
> 22 Jan 2003 12:44:30 -0800
> Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by 
> mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 
> 22 Jan 2003 12:44:29 -0800
> Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) 
> id PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
> Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500
> Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net>
> In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance>
> Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net>
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543)
> Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com>
> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> 
> archive/latest/29008
> X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
> Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257]
>
> does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay?  i'm thinking 
> about trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just 
> curious. i'm of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely 
> priced EH 16sec delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the 
> ubiquitous DL4 and although i do like it, the memory man is the least 
> realistic of all the delays IMHO...
>
>
> thanks
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>