Article: World squirms as Sobig returns (or why our boxes are stuffed with virii today)

["sserendipity" <ssrndpty@hotmail.com>]

"The sender appears to be someone from a recognized domain name, such as
ibm.com, zdnet.com or microsoft.com. The subject line typically says "Re:
Details," "Resume" or "Thank you.". Attachment names may include:
your_document.pif, details.pif, your_details.pif, thank_you.pif,
movie0045.pif, document_Fall.pif, application.pif, and document_9446.pif. "

http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5065494.html

bIz

------------
http://www.groovetronica.com - "Well, it hasn't made it into our playlist,
I'm afraid. It's summer so there are no djs here to listen to and play
music, so we're just playing automated music right now."
------------

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "msottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Mark's future looper


> On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 08:09  AM, SoundFNR@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > too lazy to hit Overdub during Record ? :-)
>
> Yup.  Got too much going on playing to want to deal with anything after
> the point I tell the loop to start.  JamMan spoiled me.
>
> >>  Touch sensitive Jog shuttle.  I want to be able to manipulate my
> >> loop=20
> >>  as one would a record.so how would you like that to sound?
> > like a dj lining up the record sort of thing?
> >
> > I imagine a Kaos pad type controller, where as soon
> > as you touch it the loop stops it's normal motion, and
> > is "scrubbed" by the motion of your finger on the pad.
> > Playback resumes when you remove your finger.
>
> Yeah, pretty much exactly like that.  Think of a record being
> scratched.  I've been doing this with a Numark Axis 9 CD player, but
> you've got to pre-record your loop for that to work.  I'd love to have
> that functionality on the fly.
>
> > the difficult concept is combining the multitrack idea (parallel)
> > with the EDP type Nextloop concept(serial)
>
> Well, we're talking the future right?  Where everything is possible!
> I'd imagine you could have all the serial EDP functions available to
> each loop, plus be able to choose to run some of them parallel.
>
> >> Decay and feedback available to me at all times.  Not feedback,
> >> which=20
> >>  has to wait for the end of a loop to vary the volume, but the
> >> ability=20
> >>  to have the loop decay gradually at a specified rate.  Available
> >> while=20=
> >>  in record, or not in record.  Standard EDP style feedback as well.
> >
> > Does EDP ReplaceMode (Loop/Delay=rPL) cover this?
>
> I don't know, I'm not an EDP owner.
>
> Mark Sottilaro
>
>