The perfectly servicing repater was re: loperlative ditching v2

[jayrope <jrploopers@kliklak.net>]

Title: The perfectly servicing repater was re: loperlative ditching v2

> mark one half sentence you said was:
>
> when
> I have a perfectly servicable Repeater?
>
> uhm why is mine not?
> it’s not at all perfectly serviceable over here.
> it sounds bad on higehr volumes, noise floor reduction is a specialists treatment I can’t do myself, plus it doesn’t supply instant looping like a lex jamman. my jamman on 12 bit sounds much better on high volumes aswell! after three years all these faders and knobs crackle. the display’s displaying funny vaslues or nothing everyonce in a  while. that means, that probably some of the faders just put out random values due to dust.
> maybe so. 
>
> the repeater is a cheap device, cheap in every component. it promises a lot, but the most simple things don’t work, like the instant looping or just an overall good sound (so electrix saved to spend on converter quality) - 
>
> I personally trust ino devices made with love, obsession fvro the eprfect, even if they don’t work in the first place. if I had the money to afford supporting bob I would do so, especially because brilliant ideas always need initial fundin, may ti seem to be overprioxed in the first place. 
>
> of courses no one really has to see it that way, but such attitude is the force of invention I belive.
>
> j