Re: RC-50 vs. Repeater?

["Thomas Maintz" <thomasmaintz@get2net.dk>]

Sorry. I meant parrallel.
Thomas

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Maintz" <thomasmaintz@get2net.dk>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: RC-50 vs. Repeater?


> Isnt it possible to run the three patches on the rc-50 in series?
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:55 PM
> Subject: RC-50 vs. Repeater?
>
>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> how would you compare the advantages of RC-50 versus Electrix Repeater?
>>
>> RC-50:
>> - more memory (49 minutes mono)
>> - 7 pedals "included"
>> - USB connection
>> - Shifting between patches (1 patch = 3 phrases = 3 loops) possible
>> - ...
>>
>> Repeater:
>> - better Tempo Sync?
>> - 4 Loops in parallel
>> - ...
>>
>> best regards
>> Buzap
>>
>> -- 
>>
>>
>> Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
>> "Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>>
>>
>
>
>