] [Thread Prev
Re: RC-50 vs. Repeater?
Judging by what people are saying about the RC-50, it
seems to me that the Repeater blows it away if you're
interested in nicely midi synced loops. Repeater
doesn't have USB, but it does have a CFC card so you
can transfer your loops... I find I rarely do that
anyway. Easier to record them into the computer as
it's my clock source anyway. That way as my loop
changes in a <100% feedback (what? OH RIGHT THE RC-50
can't do that!) I have early and late versions of the
Who cares about 49 minutes of loop time? Silly.
Repeater with a 256 meg card is PLENTY. If you need
more get yourself a computer. Also, 99 4 track loops.
Easy to go from one to another.
--- Buzap Buzap <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys
> how would you compare the advantages of RC-50 versus
> Electrix Repeater?
> - more memory (49 minutes mono)
> - 7 pedals "included"
> - USB connection
> - Shifting between patches (1 patch = 3 phrases = 3
> loops) possible
> - ...
> - better Tempo Sync?
> - 4 Loops in parallel
> - ...
> best regards
> Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
> "Feel free" mit GMX DSL!
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around