Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Musicianship, live technique, etc...

>It's interesting to contrast these views as they relate to music and how 
>they relate to painting or drawing. I think if you brought up the subject 
>of audience's importance to most painters they would give you a long 
>questioning look, right after they finished laughing. Potential audience 
>receptivity is a problem for commercial artists, not "fine" artists. I'm 
>pretty much on the fence, myself.

The problem is that there are artists with talent and artists without.  And
often artists without talent will hide behind the statement of "it's art".
What I meant in my original statement is that, whilst you don't necessarily
need to play _at_ an audience, if you expect to play to an audience (more
than once!) it helps if they actually like it, rather than the performer
hiding behind hyperbole of how it's an expression of an artist's inner

>I figure if I don't like what I'm doing, 
>nobody else will, either (although I've been proven wrong on that 

I think Allan Holdsworth regularly disproves that one!  :)


Dr Michael Pycraft Hughes      Bioelectronic Research Centre, Rankine Bldg,
Tel: (+44) 141 330 5979        University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
    "Wha's like us?  Damn few, and they're a' deid!" - Scottish proverb