Support |
While I definitely agree with you on your points and there certainly is no shortage of overblown, ego inflated, crap in both art galleries and record stores, I can't help but think that the best way to succeed as an artist is to pursue your own voice. If you're successful in finding it, your audience will find you ( I know that sounds like particularly sentimental crap but think of artists like Richard Thompson or Robert Fripp or Frank Zappa or David Torn). Tom Attix Software Testing Engineer Microsoft Corporation toma@microsoft.com -----Original Message----- From: pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk [SMTP:pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 1997 8:04 To: Tom Attix Subject: RE: Musicianship, live technique, etc... >It's interesting to contrast these views as they relate to music and how >they relate to painting or drawing. I think if you brought up the subject >of audience's importance to most painters they would give you a long >questioning look, right after they finished laughing. Potential audience >receptivity is a problem for commercial artists, not "fine" artists. I'm >pretty much on the fence, myself. The problem is that there are artists with talent and artists without. And often artists without talent will hide behind the statement of "it's art". What I meant in my original statement is that, whilst you don't necessarily need to play _at_ an audience, if you expect to play to an audience (more than once!) it helps if they actually like it, rather than the performer hiding behind hyperbole of how it's an expression of an artist's inner soul. >I figure if I don't like what I'm doing, >nobody else will, either (although I've been proven wrong on that >before..). I think Allan Holdsworth regularly disproves that one! :) Michael Dr Michael Pycraft Hughes Bioelectronic Research Centre, Rankine Bldg, Tel: (+44) 141 330 5979 University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. "Wha's like us? Damn few, and they're a' deid!" - Scottish proverb