Support |
I have to aggree with you guys. I've been working with computers on an almost daily basis for many years, but they just don't seem to be as "useable" in a musical context as a dedicated unit w/ tactile controls (buttons & knobs). But on the other hand, computer sequencers are much more flexible than dedicated units. One thing I'm trying that seems to be working well is putting the CPU in a different room. I poked a 2" hole in the wall and put it on the other side (next to the sofa in my living room). Now my 'studio' (studio/darkroom/office/....) is very quiet. It's actually kind of weird to use a computer that doesn't make any noise. There's an article in last months Electronic Musician about cables to do this. jim Neil Goldstein wrote: > > > I know home computers > >and their software can now do a lot, but their unreliable operating > >systems, noisy hardware, lack of tactile control, and bulk, make for a > >capricious and sometimes annoying creative tool. > > > > I love the power and visual ease of working with a computer but you hit >the > nail right on the head on why it just sometimes isn't very inspiring or > *fun*. Well spoken. > > I sometimes get tripped up in trying to pick the best tool for the job, >and > I think I've sort of been "in denial" that sometimes working with the > computer is "annoying". > > Also know there's lots of times I've capturing something with JamMan >that I > wished I would have first layered and multi-tracked into the computer > (Logic Audio being my fav), before it became permanently mixed in mono! > > Neil > ngold@teleport.com > Portland, OR USA