Support |
Hey, For what the JamMan does for the money it sold for ($350 new) it was a great product and nothing touched it or touches it for anywhere near that price. On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, T.W. Hartnett wrote: > >I think (and we could do this to death) that unless you're _really_ >going > >to get into looping (and get an EDP), the JM was just too expensive at >its > >original price. Sound quality apart, most people don't want a >helluvalot > >more functionality than the Zoom 508. If it had more memory and a "fade" > >function, I'd trade my JM for a 508!!! > > What do you mean by a "fade" function? > > Travis Hartnett >