Re: Sampling copyrights

["Larry Tremblay" <ltct@concentric.net>]

Again, the issue is uniqueness (as defined) and recognition.
It is these factors which determine whether or not the
perpetrator is aggrandizing himself at the expense of an
other's work. It's all about money. Ref: Negativeland,
Plunderphonics, et al.

----- Original Message -----
From: "sorin" <sorin@widomaker.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: Sampling copyrights


> Last I herd, we had a law student working at our office ws that 2 seconds
> as you say, however he brought a good point up. If you take a sample and
> tweak and turn and make it your own so that it is not reconizable then it
> is your work...
>
>
>
> seAN
>
>
> 
>--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
*
>
> Widomaker Communications Services, Inc
> Network Operations Center ( NOC )
> Williamsburg Va
> (757) 253-7621
>
> I'm a member of the FVK..
>
> 
>--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
*
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Kevin Cheli-Colando wrote:
>
> > Anyone know what the current fair use for samples is?  Last I knew it
was something
> > like 2 seconds and under was acceptable and longer samples than that
needed
> > credit/permission, etc.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
>
>