Re: question on bowing, looping mechanisms

[lance glover <baumhaus@earthlink.net>]

lindsay@pavestone.com wrote:

> We're not going to start talking about Tibetan Bowls again, are we?
>
> I don't know if I could stand another oscilloscope-laden dispute over
> fundamentals and the harmonic properties of a bell-shaped instrument.
>
> Even though I think I fomented a great deal of the furor.
>
>

so far, you're the only one that's mentioned them.

:-)

lance g.