Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>O my peeps,
>
>> If I hit "undo" *after* I've finished the multiply (by hitting
>> multiply a second time), the material that recorded during the multiply
>> is erased, but the loop length remains multiplied. This isn't what I
>> want. I know that I can "trim" the loop back to a single cycle, but
>> that's extra (and annoying) work. Anyone else consider this to be a
>> shortcoming?
>
>I personally don't consider it a shortcoming, but I think it depends
>upon exactly what you're trying to do. And depending on the length
>of the multiple/cycle, it might scarcely take any additional time...
>
>If you basically want to multiply a loop, and then instantly reduce it
>to a single cycle with no sound... Hmmm. Off the top of my head I'm
>not 100% sure how one would do that, but Insertmode=replace would be a
>good place to start. Multiple loops would be another strategy.
I dont think he wants it with silence, but if so, just reduce FB
while multiplying!
>
>This is the usual point in a thread when Kim pipes in with the
>brilliantly simple and obvious answer that we've all overlooked, so...
> Kim?
>
>> I have been using record or overdub to end a remultiply a lot, thus
>creating
>> a new cycle. Does this "bug" manifest itself in this case? (I would
>check
>> it out myself, but nothing is set up right now.)
>
>I don't THINK so, but don't quote me on it. Part of what gives the
>Sylmar trick it's characteristic sound is that it scrolls through the
>memory of different cycles, even after those cycles have been deleted.
> But I believe that ending a remultiply with record or overdub wipes
>the memory in such a way that this doesn't happen.
thats what I was asking about: so far, after a Multi-Record, you
cannot go back before that with UNDO, but that would be easy to
change.
Multi-Overdub is just the same as Multi-Multi, in respect to timing and
Undo.
--
---> http://Matthias.Grob.org