Support |
*munch, munch, munch* *pop poppop poppoppoppdddpdddpdddpddpddd .......pop!!!!!!* <microwave ding!> <chair squeak> <footsteps> <rustling noises, smell of fake butter> <footsteps returning> <chair squeak> *munch, munch, munch* ----- Original Message ----- From: "Caliban Tiresias Darklock" <caliban@darklock.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Basic intro (OT) > On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:54:37 -0500, "Dennis Leas" <dennis@mdbs.com> > wrote: > > >Golly this has turned into quite a thread! > > > >I think "blanket statements" lead to a "warm discussion" (excuse the pun, > >but it IS Friday). > > Consider the statement IN CONTEXT. Context, context, context, people! As > posted: > > ----- > > > but what do *your* ears tell *you*?) > > That any single sound is not music. Music is by definition a combination > and sequence of sounds > > ----- > > Now, if you'd like to second-guess what my ears tell me, I guess that's > your prerogative. Not that anyone could have any logical grounds for > such a process, but whatever turns you on. > > Now, let's address the concept of this being "wrong". In terms of > whether my *opinion* is technically correct, let's apply the standard > razor of the dictionary. Webster's Revised Unabridged: > > 1. The science and the art of tones, or musical sounds, i. e., sounds of > higher or lower pitch, begotten of uniform and synchronous vibrations, > as of a string at various degrees of tension; the science of harmonical > tones which treats of the principles of harmony, or the properties, > dependences, and relations of tones to each other; the art of combining > tones in a manner to please the ear. > > 2. (a) Melody; a rhythmical and otherwise agreeable succession of tones. > (b) Harmony; an accordant combination of simultaneous tones. > > 3. The written and printed notation of a musical composition; the score. > > 4. Love of music; capacity of enjoying music. > > 5. (Zo["o]l.) A more or less musical sound made by many of the lower > animals. See Stridulation. > > Well, gee. It appears that BY DEFINITION, "sound" *is* plural in music. > Clearly, there exists at least one definition in which this is not true, > but I also clearly do not intend that definition. If you choose to > commit the fallacy of equivocation regardless, feel free to do so -- > with the understanding that no conclusion reached through this process > will be logically valid, nor will it have any bearing on the validity of > my OPINION. > >