Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
That clock looks very interesting indeed- I can't seem to find any sales info- do you have further info? I have heard that a good master clock in a studio makes a big difference- last issue of EQ had an article I think- Thanks- Cliff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bret" <echoplex@yahoo.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: Re: OT:Digital resolution for analog sound > Try > http://www.digido.com/analog_versus_digital.html > and use one of these > http://www.rogernichols.com/DAClock.html > > --- Greg Kucharo <telecaster@mac.com> wrote: > > Sorry for this grossly off topic post, but I think the members of > > this list > > are a shrewd and opinionated bunch when it comes to this topic. > > > > Computer graphics pioneer Alvy Ray Smith is oft quoted as saying > > that; > > "Reality is 80 million polygons per second". I have wondered lately > > if there is > > an audio version of this idea. If analog recording is the most > > realistic of > > sound recording techniques, then what is the required resolution of > > digital > > going to need to be to fool/satisfy even the most anti-Digital of > > audiophiles. > > This is of course grossly simplifying the analog vs digital debate, > > but the > > question is how to make digital, which is obviously not going away, > > achieve the > > positive benefits of tape recording. > > > > > > Just a thought... > > > > > > bonus question- Tips on making a decent hybrid of digital and analog > > home > > studios. The sound of analog with the flexibility of digital. I know, > > it's a > > huge question. > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam > > possit materiari? > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! > http://greetings.yahoo.com >