Support |
Lance - most people (myself included) miss the fact that the RPTR literature states that it is a "loop based recorder" which I think answers most questions. not sure about Perille's gear or the RS item, but check 'em all out in a hands on manner if at all possible is my best advice. best regards, Pedro Felix - NYC 2002 --- Lance Chance <lrc8918@louisiana.edu> wrote: > I have a Gibson echoplex and I just acquired an > electrix repeater. One of my primary goals in > looping is to create multitimbral sustained ambient > drones. the echoplex does this very nicely with no > pops or other artifacts that occur as you record > over the start point of your loop. I was hoping to > get a more versatile (and stereo) version of this > same ability in the repeater. Unfortunately, this > was not to be. After some experimentation, I > discovered that on overdub, as a drone or sustained > note was recorded over the start point, there was a > distinct artifact (a popping sound sometimes, an > amplitude inconsistency others). I finally decided > that this was because the echoplex is based on a > delay architecture rather than a sampler/recorder > architecture like the repeater. I think what is > happening in the repeater is that on overdub the > sample is actually mixed and resampled with each > pass rather than the more traditional method of > creating an infinite delay loop. > > The whole point of this is to ask these questions: > Am I right or just not using my repeater correctly? > Is there a stereo delay type looper out there in > production or easily available? Are all "dj" > oriented loopers (djrnd3, red sound) like this? And > finally, is this a quality that loopers should > address when reviewing devices for wonderful and > informative sites such as this one? > > thanx, > lance > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com