Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
At 10:43 AM 8/17/2002, Claude Voit wrote: > > The idea to have the FB rate depending on the loop time to achieve an > > absolute fading time has been arround for a while (also on this list?) > > Technically it would not be complicated. We may have it in the > > future, but I suspect it will not be perfectly usefull either... > > -- > >at the point where Loop x.xx will finally be a multitracker (meaning >each >layer separate) why would you necessarily want that? I would rather have multi-tracks but also the ability to layer things on one track just as it works now. The layering concept from delays turns out to be such a simple to use and elegant interface for making complex loops. The "track" interface from recording studios gives more flexibility, but at the expense of a much more complex user interface. >real feedback would be obsolete and replaced by layer volume to me, they are not the same concepts at all. How does one replace the other? For me, the feedback+overdub combination very neatly and easily accomplishes something that is really complicated to manage with multiple tracks, for both the user and the system. I don't really see the point of trying to replace one with the other. >and very limited undo per layer overdub (new layer) then short undo :mute >of the new layer; long undo: erase and discard this last layer feedback >reduction would then mean layer output volume fade out (virtual >feedback) as we do not want the memory fill with undo layers while >reducing feedback we could save a bunch of memory like that, for the sake >of a maximum of seperate tracks. but I do want the memory to fill with previous versions as feedback changes it. Then I can undo it to go backwards, which is interesting itself, but especially interesting when combined with overdubbing. That gives a very simple and intuitive way to evolve and unevolve a loop with just two buttons and a knob and very little thinking required. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com