Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Yes it sure would be nice to see diagrams of peoples rigs. For me, everything in my rig is stereo except for the EDP. I would prefer to not have to switch between mono & stereo when I move from live to studio which is why I initially opted for stereo to begin with. In fact when playing live, I give myself a stereo monitor mix and just send a mono signal to the house. But, the EDP is still a wrinkle in the mix. I have Repeater but frankly have decided that because it has the glitch/bump that shows up with ambient loops, it is unusable for live play and is not nearly as flexible as the EDP. All my synths have effects of their own (except the Nord Micro) so I guess I could rely on those effects for EDP loop creation. I just would prefer to be able to use my Eclipse to be able to process both the pre-loop material and my main signal, but in a way so that everything doesn't turn to mush. Steve > > A very simerlar setup to me Mark, but its kind of annoying > that i have to dedicate certain effects to the Repeaters FX > loop and then not have them available for NON loop material, > thinking now of using the Repeater 4 channel-out option to my > desk, but suspect that i will get into a right old mess with > pre fade and post fade issues. Does anyone make a mixer where > the Aux sends are neither Pre or Post but operate more like a > DJ mix fader, IE:one end completely dry, one end completely > wet, but main fader operating as per usual with Vol... > > Suggested it before and it went down like a lead balloon, but > would like to see in diagrammatical form, the routing/setups > of peoples rigs... Using Microsoft Visio we could all make > simerlar drawing that would be very usful for the archives methinks, > > MArk Red > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 5:17 AM > Subject: Re: Stereo Effects & EDP > > > > I have the same issue. To make matters worse, part of my > "style" has > > become using the Repeater's effects loop to be able to play > dry (well, > > somewhat dry...) into the Repeater, then have only what's > in the loop > > be effected by what's in the effects loop. Very useful. > I'm sure the > > same could be done with two EDPs and a programmable patchbay, but > > there's not the cash for that right now. > > > > Basically, I'm planning on using the EDP for live gigs where stereo > > isn't an issue, and the Repeater in the studio where it's more > > effective. I'm still hashing this out. > > > > Mark Sottilaro > > > > On Wednesday, August 21, 2002, at 07:55 PM, M. Steven Ginn wrote: > > > > > Most of what I have read about effects routing and the > EDP recommend > > > running an effects processor first and then through the EDP. If > > > this is the case then what is needed to say go into an Eclipse > > > effects processor in stereo, come out of the Eclipse and > split the > > > signal so that it not only goes back to the main mix bus (aux > > > return, etc.), it also goes into a stereo to mono > adapter/combiner > > > of some sort to go into the EDP? Then I guess I will > come out the > > > EDP back to the main mix where the original, effects and > EDP signals > > > are combined. I am on the right track here, or am I > making it too > > > complicated? Kim said that if I were to put the Eclipse > at the end > > > of the signal path and apply effects to the dry mix and the EDP > > > return, it would probably get a bit muddy. The main > thing about my > > > mix is that everything I have is stereo and can be routed stereo, > > > except for the EDP. I wish I could afford another one > and solve my > > > problem that way, but that's not possible right now. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > M. Steven Ginn > > > > > > ******************************** > > > Please go to > > > <www.SeptemberRising.org> > > > Listen to the music. > > > Purchase the CD > > > Support the NY Firefighters > > > 9/11 Relief Fund > > > ******************************** > > > > > > > > >