RE: Stereo Effects & EDP

["M. Steven Ginn" <sginn@airmail.net>]

You didn't misunderstand ... I was just going by what Kim had suggested
a while back regarding effects routing and the EDP.  He said that if I
ran my signal through the EDP first (dry) and then processed that with
my effects (Eclipse), the chances were pretty good that my mix would end
up being like mush.  I always thought that applying effects like reverb
for example before a looping device would cutoff the tails and part of
the effects.  I feel that your recommendation of going from mono to
stereo to preserve the stereo image is better but I just wasn't sure
based on what Kim had suggested.

Thanks,
Steve

> 
> >Most of what I have read about effects routing and the EDP recommend 
> >running an effects processor first and then through the EDP.
> huh?
> in that case, you lose the stereo image of the stereo 
> processors..... which 
> is interesting, but.
> if you want to loop the fx of your eclipse in stereo, then 
> you'll need 2 
> edp's post-eclipse.
> if your stereo image is being created by the eclipse, then 
> you could have the 
> edp inserted before the eclipse.
> maybe i misunderstand, again, though.
> best,
> dt / splattercell
>