Re: Delay Question

[sine@zerocrossing.net]

Don't you hate when that happens?  Actually, I'm still not sure I 
understand
what you're trying to do.

Marklar

Stuart Wyatt wrote:

> Thanks for the idea with the Repeater... I'll give that a go. Although
> its not what I was originally looking for, it opens up other
> possibilities :) Using feedback would reduce the strength of the loop
> after each cycle... in fact thinking about it, I have just  realised
> that what I am asking for probably does not exist...
>
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 11:50 PM, sine@zerocrossing.net wrote:
>
> > Huh, I'm not sure what your rig is like, but why not use one stereo
> > pair of
> > the repeater for your "basic beat" then put the second stereo pair into
> > record with a feedback of your choice.  This can change all the time
> > depending on how fast you want the second part to evolve.
> >
> > For bonus, I use a Lexicon MPX1's delay to grab a set chunk (anywhere
> > from
> > a 1/16 to an 1/8) of my loop and repeat it at will.  This can be really
> > cool.  Kind of Andre LaFosse like, if I hit the sample (a/b) button at 
>a
> > kind of random point.  I'm not sure how long it will stay synched, but
> > it
> > seems to go a long time. (btw, I'm not using clock from the Repeater to
> > do
> > this, as it doesn't work)
> >
> > If this doesn't work, I think the Echoplex in delay mode may be your
> > only
> > choice.  I've had luck with synching an EDP to it.  Be prepared to pay
> > $1300 if you want it in stereo.  Other delays seem to hate the
> > Repeater's
> > clock, including ones made by Electrix.
> >
> > Marklar
> >