Re: Delay Question

[Stuart Wyatt <stuart@solostring.com>]

Thanks for the idea with the Repeater... I'll give that a go. Although 
its not what I was originally looking for, it opens up other 
possibilities :) Using feedback would reduce the strength of the loop 
after each cycle... in fact thinking about it, I have just  realised 
that what I am asking for probably does not exist...

On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 11:50 PM, sine@zerocrossing.net wrote:

> Huh, I'm not sure what your rig is like, but why not use one stereo 
> pair of
> the repeater for your "basic beat" then put the second stereo pair into
> record with a feedback of your choice.  This can change all the time
> depending on how fast you want the second part to evolve.
>
> For bonus, I use a Lexicon MPX1's delay to grab a set chunk (anywhere 
> from
> a 1/16 to an 1/8) of my loop and repeat it at will.  This can be really
> cool.  Kind of Andre LaFosse like, if I hit the sample (a/b) button at a
> kind of random point.  I'm not sure how long it will stay synched, but 
> it
> seems to go a long time. (btw, I'm not using clock from the Repeater to 
> do
> this, as it doesn't work)
>
> If this doesn't work, I think the Echoplex in delay mode may be your 
> only
> choice.  I've had luck with synching an EDP to it.  Be prepared to pay
> $1300 if you want it in stereo.  Other delays seem to hate the 
> Repeater's
> clock, including ones made by Electrix.
>
> Marklar
>