Re: Delightful . . .

[Tom Ritchford <tom@swirly.com>]

>It's just a thought. But, I've always thought the "Delight" part a little
>too cute, odd, funky, strange, whatever -- sorry Kim (it's just an
>opinion). I've been part of this community since almost it's inception.
>I value it very highly . . . but the name has always caused problems in
>trying to get outsiders to take anything I might quote from it seriously.

that's the *best part*!  NEVER change it!

It's a lovely and literary and light name and it's very distinctive.

Think about it -- how "business.com" and "pets.com" and
all those other places with generic names never managed to make
any headway while companies with weird names like
Amazon and Yahoo developed a brand-following.

Death before blandness!

     /t
-- 

http://loopNY.com ......................An "open loop": shows every 
Saturday!
http://extremeNY.com/submit .......................... submit to the 
calendar.