Support |
Hi, I'm not a guitarist, but this post interested me because I do think a lot about what we expect of 'alternative MIDI controllers' and how we play them. I agree that the conversion needs to be fast, track/play well and be reliable/predictable.I play a MIDI wind controller and really came very quickly to consider it a entirely different instrument from my saxophone - an instrument (or I guess more accurately, part of an instrument together with the sound source) in its own right - its different from a guitar synth (I know) coz it is physically different from a sax (not a converter. Most of the sounds that I play with it, sound terrible if played like a saxophone - for me, its about 'playing the patches', developing new ways of playing as suggested by each different sound - herein lies the excitement and creativity for me. I think of a pianist, who might first try playing all their synth sounds like a piano - this is certainly what I did when I first got my wind synth (I did what I knew). I guess I'm questioning whether using all of our well-honed instrument techniques to 'play' the infinite palette of synth sounds through MIDI converters/controllers, will do justice to those sounds, or if its more that these sounds might require a new set of playing techniques. Whether guitar techniques work for the guitar but might not for an un-guitar-like patch? - this is certainly my experience and philosophy with my wind synth. It does mean that loops can become very stylistically varied and expressive, changing sounds with the associated playing techniques for them. What do others think? There must be a whole lot of experience of using guitar/wind/drum/violin/etc... to MIDI converters or purpose designed interfaces for non-keyboard access to synth sounds. Ian. At 21:48 14/02/03 , you wrote: > > I'm totally skeptical about all the midi pickups and midi conversion systems. > I wonder if there is anything out there with no >tracking/latency/interface > problems at all? I mean I want to play a guitar synthesizer, which means >it > really is a guitar, and it also really is a synth. I want to be able to >use > all the methods of producing sound that I currently use with just my >guitar > (bending, vibrato, tone control from the pick/fingers, legato, palm >muting, > pick scrapes, muted strumming, harmonics, picking behind the nut, altered > tunings etc). I want every nuance of my playing to come through as much as it > would with a good overdrive pedal. As a lower priority, if it were >possible > to also use digitally controlled analog design methods, and use things >like > midi in/out, a sequencer, an arpeggiator, and split sound >strings/fretboard > areas, that would be my other request. But, the fact is, I doubt all >this is > possible in one unit. Maybe my b! es! t bet is to go for a GR-300, or >build > my own, and use it with just looping, in lieu of a sequencer? I honestly > haven't done enough research to know.