Support |
> --- Jeffrey Lomas <jeff.lomas@oasis-open.org> wrote: > > I would then give two signals (right/left) to the > > house which could just be panned hard. > > Sounds good. > > One caveat: things may have changed since I was > gigging a lot (like you, I'm talking about the Boston > area), but I found that stereo was the exception more > than the rule in house systems. A couple of reasons > for this: mono requires half the number of power amps > (a lot of clubs run the mains off one side and the > monitors off the other), and significantly, a lot of > sound guys/club owners are concerned that the mix be > essentially the same in any part of the room. > (Instruments panned hard aren't heard at all by many > of the patrons in odd-shaped rooms. > > So, go ahead with your two-signal plan, but be > prepared in the event that the sound guy is running > mono. > > -t- I've also found that a true stereo pa in a club is the exception. I investigated many, many clubs here in Toronto when I was looking for a new home for The Ambient Ping & had my eyes opened. (I did find a club with stereo, subs and a great beer selection!) As Tim pointed out - many clubs run left to the house & right to the monitors or use up the left & right on bi-amping. True stereo also means more 32 band EQs, crossovers, house compressors etc... Be sure to record yourself upstream before you get monofied. Cheers, Scott M2 http://www.dreamSTATE.to ambientelectronicsoundscapes http://www.THEAMBiENTPiNG.com