Re: Forum for Boomerang Discussion/Users

[Ian Petersen <iep@mail.dk>]

Don,

> That's fine if you don't want to join.

It's not so much that I don't want to join. I just don't see the point 
of making a separate list about the Boomerang. The 'rang is a fine 
piece of kit, but I just don't think anything can be said about it that 
is not generally relevant to all loopers. It is, after all, the 
simplest and most straightforward of all the dedicated loopers. What is 
there to be said about it that can't be said on this list?

I'm all ears if anyone has any good tips 'n' tricks about the 'rang; 
undocumented features, or how to convert it into an EDP with two bent 
paper clips and a roll of tinfoil. However, I'm not holding my breath. 
I've scoured the archives of this list and haven't found anything much 
of interest about the 'rang other than it pretty much works as 
advertised and is a good solid product.

Don't get me wrong: I love my 'rang, and would love to see more 
discussion about it, but I don't see what purpose it would serve to 
split that discussion onto another list. It would just make both lists 
less valuable for all of us.

-- 

  Ian Petersen