Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
--- Lance Chance <lrc8918@louisiana.edu> wrote: Not to be argumentative, or to discourage anyone from getting an EDP (which sounds like a great unit), but you make some statements about the Repeater which I don't understand. You mentioned the easier foot pedal setup. Well, yeah. The EDP has a dedicated foot pedal that you buy pre-configured. It doesn't get much easier then that. With the Repeater, you have to use a midi controller, which means programming it. That's always going to be more complicated. However, I've noticed that many of the more advanced users of the EDP also use a midi controller with it, to make more options and more control immediately available. The difficulty of programming a midi controller will be about the same whether you're controlling a Repeater or an EDP, so I don't really see this as a big advantage. And yes, while you can buy that simple dedicated foot controller for the EDP, they charge you almost as much for this basic metal box (which consists of just 7 switches and a handful of resistors) as you might pay for a nice Behringer MIDI foot controller, which is infinitely more versatile. Now, I -really- like the fact that you can plug an expression pedal directly into the EDP and control feedback (and other parameters?). That's a really nice feature. > i find the repeater more > difficult to use in a studio environment, where it's stutters and >fluttery > artifacts are much more apparent than in a live venue. I've never heard any "stutters or fluttery artifacts" when using my Repeater. It plays back what I play in. Is there a specific sequence of events or functions you use which triggers this? > if i had to drop one, i guess it would be the repeater, because though it > can do a whole lot more, the work that i have done with my edp and just >my > guitar is much more professional sounding than the work i have done with > the repeater. so, despite not being able to even twist the durn delay >time > (grrrr) on the edp, for me it finally came down to sound quality. Given that the Repeater has higher fidelity then the EDP, I don't understand this comment. I've never had any problems with it's sound quality, as long as it's run at the right signal levels, it's line level, and if you try to run it at instrument levels, it'll be noisy. That's not unique to the Repeater. Most studio effects are like this. Or are you talking about the slight ticking sound some people get on track 1 when using the CFC? Apparently that varies in intensity from unit to unit, mine doesn't do it. > the edp > sounds awesome. no doubt. it is warm and full and loops without the > slightest hint of a pop. i make a lot of textural soundscapes and this > thing about pops at the loop point is almost a tie breaker right off the > bat, for me. if you are an ebow player, i bet that you know what i am > talking about. I am, and I don't. I hear a very slight change (usually a little surge) in volume around the loop point on the Repeater, never a pop. It's never bothered me. > i say get the edp. I don't necessarily disagree, depending on what someone wants to do, and how they like to work. For me, the Repeater works in a very intuitive way and it allows many many flexable options for manipulation which the EDP doesn't (time stretching/contracting, pitch manipulation, panning, time shifting, multiple tracks for realtime mixing, effects loop, etc). The EDP, on the other hand is extremely powerful in other respects. Compare what you like, how you work, the level things need to run in your rig, and what features you want to use while playing, and the choice will probably become clear. Greg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/